A melhor ferramenta para a sua pesquisa, trabalho e TCC!
- [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Harvard University
- Universidade Duke
- The Suntory Toyota International Centers for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics and Political Science
- Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics and Political Science
- Blog post from London School of Economics & Political Science
- LSE IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science
- The London School of Economics and Political Science
- Hellenic Observatory, London School of Economics and Political Science
- Mais Publicadores...
Political Economy of Village Governance in Contemporary China
America's reluctant allies : the genesis of the political-military cultures of Japan and West Germany
Essays in Political Methodology
Destructivity: A Political Economy of Military Effectiveness in Conventional Combat
Abstract
Neither technological nor numerical superiority accounts for the outcome of most battles. Instead, some intangible factor has historically mattered more. The political science literature has termed this factor `military effectiveness', yet using this phrase to refer solely to efficiency in one of the many tasks militaries are asked to perform can be dangerous. Armies which are good at conventional combat may be less effective at internal security, for instance. I therefore propose a new term `destructivity' to refer exclusively to military effectiveness in high intensity, conventional warfare.
Previous literature has suggested a number of factors which may account for variation between states in their levels of destructivity. Wealth, human capital, regime type, ethnic heterogeneity, culture and the external pressures of the international system have all been suggested by past scholars. Quantitative literature has uncovered many broad level correlations which could map onto numerous plausible causal mechanisms, while the qualitative literature has pointed to numerous theories which have remained untested outside the small number of cases which motivated them.
My dissertation puts forward a unified theory of destructivity based on the recognition that armies are not unitary actors but must be understood in light of the motivations and interactions of the individual officers and men which comprise them. Borrowing a concept from organizational economics...